Skip to main content
· 9/21/1999

Guy Amir v. St. Louis University

Citations

  • 184 F.3d 1017
  • 1999 WL 529404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Rehabilitation Act \imposes a requirement that a person's disability serve as the sole impetus for a defendant's adverse action against the plaintiff\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Gibson, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.