Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 3/19/1986

Gutter v. Dow Jones, Inc.

Citations

  • 22 Ohio St. 3d 286
  • 490 N.E.2d 898
  • 56 A.L.R. 4th 1153
  • 12 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1999
  • 22 Ohio B. 457
  • 1986 Ohio LEXIS 590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • extending liability to publisher where plaintiff unjustifiably relied on its erroneous statement would have staggering deterrent effect on potential purveyors of printed material
  • publisher of Wall Street Journal not liable to subscriber for non-defamatory negligent misrepresentation relied on by reader in choosing securities investment
  • newspaper reader not a member of a limited group of persons intended to benefit from representation in newspaper
  • publisher of Wall Street Journal not liable to subscriber for non-defamatory negligent misrepresentation relied on by reader in choosing securities investment
  • “Recently, however, a growing number of courts have demonstrated a willingness to extend liability for negligent misrepresentation in special eases.”
  • tort action against newspaper by its readers found improper, as readers “do[] not fall within a special limited class (or group) of foreseeable persons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.