Gutman v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that claims of employment discrimination and retaliatory discharge did not exist at common law
• finding plaintiff failed to state a claim for negligent supervision where the underlying injury resulted from a violation of the ADA, “which is not a recognized common law tort” in Florida
• “Defendants are correct that the underlying wrong for either claim [negligent 33 supervision or negligent training] must be a common law tort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).