Gutka v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, even though the ALJ did not expressly find the claimant disabled, he should have followed procedures set forth in SSR 83-20 in light of an uncon-troverted physician’s opinion that the claimant was disabled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).