Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 12/29/1998

Gutierrez v. Medley

Citations

  • 972 P.2d 913
  • 359 Utah Adv. Rep. 46
  • 1998 Utah LEXIS 100
  • 1998 WL 901710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[Wle hold that the Subpoena Powers Act can be used by the State only prior to the filing of formal criminal charges.\
  • “The proper interpretation and application of a statute is a question of law which we review for correctness, affording no deference to the district court’s legal conclusion.”
  • \The proper interpretation and application of a statute is a question of law which we review for correctness. . . . \
  • “The proper interpretation and application of a statute is a question of law which we review for correctness, affording no deference to the district court’s legal conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russon, Stewart, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman, Russon'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.