Gutierres-Landeros v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the injunctive relief plaintiff sought under the ADA was moot because he failed to identify “any additional relief that the [defendant] ha[d] not already implemented.”
• noting that the Fifth Circuit has previously required “something more than ‘deliberate indifference’ to show intent”
• noting that a plaintiff seeking monetary damages under Title II of the ADA or RA must establish that the discrimination was intentional, while no such showing is required for declaratory and injunctive relief
• noting that to be considered a prevailing party entitled to attorney’s fees under the ADA, a party must, among other things, “achieve judicially-sanctioned relief” (quoting Davis v. Abbott, 781 F.3d 207, 214 (5th Cir 2015)
• noting that equitable claims do not require a showing of intent
• noting that equitable claims do not require a showing of intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).