Guthrie v. Ditech Financial, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was appropriate to exclude testimony where the authenticity of a document was undisputed and defendant did not articulate an alternative reason to require testimony other than to authenticate the document
• stating “even if the court granted a motion for a new trial, the complained-of summary judgment rulings would stand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).