Skip to main content
· 3/24/1975

Guthrie v. Barda

Citations

  • 533 P.2d 487
  • 188 Colo. 124
  • 1975 Colo. LEXIS 634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding an arbitration provision that only stated that claims “shall be submitted to binding arbitration”
  • upholding district court order dismissing action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on valid agreement to arbitrate
  • “Whether a court has jurisdiction to proceed is a matter to be determined by the court . . . .” (emphasis added)
  • determination of disputed issues of fact necessary to ascertain whether arbitration clause was valid, and hence, whether the court had jurisdiction to proceed
  • determination of disputed issues of fact necessary to ascertain whether arbitration clause was valid, and hence, whether the court had jurisdiction to proceed
  • when findings of jurisdictional facts are required, they must be made by court prior to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pringle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.