· 3/24/1975
Guthrie v. Barda
Citations
- 533 P.2d 487
- 188 Colo. 124
- 1975 Colo. LEXIS 634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding an arbitration provision that only stated that claims “shall be submitted to binding arbitration”
- upholding district court order dismissing action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on valid agreement to arbitrate
- “Whether a court has jurisdiction to proceed is a matter to be determined by the court . . . .” (emphasis added)
- determination of disputed issues of fact necessary to ascertain whether arbitration clause was valid, and hence, whether the court had jurisdiction to proceed
- determination of disputed issues of fact necessary to ascertain whether arbitration clause was valid, and hence, whether the court had jurisdiction to proceed
- when findings of jurisdictional facts are required, they must be made by court prior to trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pringle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.