Guthrie Ex Rel. Powe v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court is “not to review the case ‘de novo’ or reweigh the evidence
• noting that the three evaluative steps are “(1) whether the child is engaged in substantial gainful activity; (2) whether the child has an impairment or a combination of impairments that is severe; and (3) whether the child has an impairment(s
• explaining the “three-step sequential evaluation [that] is used to determine whether a child is eligible for [benefits] on the basis of a disability”
• “This Court is not permitted to re-weigh the significance of the evidence in .the record, but rather to deter-: mine whether the- ALJ’s decision - is supported by substantial evidence.”
• “This Court is not permitted to re-weigh the significance of the evidence in the record, but rather to determine whether the ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).