Gustin v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• informant’s testimony admissible because reward was not dependent upon making a case against particular persons specified in advance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Schlei
  Eleventh Circuit· 1997-09-18· cited 287×
• Henderson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-11-16· cited 148×
• United States v. Jorge Guerra
  Eleventh Circuit· 2002-06-11· cited 66×
• United States v. Robert S. Palow, United States of America v. Paul C. Alvarado
  First Circuit· 1985-11-14· cited 57×
• United States v. Frank Carcaise
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-06-24· cited 43×
• United States v. Douglas Mark Pritchett, Phillip Doyle Boothe, David E. Pritchett, Joseph C. Pritchett, Rhonda Pritchett (Reinstated)
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-08-09· cited 31×
• United States v. Wilfredo Miguel Ventura, Rene Acosta Perez
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-07-30· cited 28×
• White v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-08-20· cited 28×
• State v. Morales
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-11-14· cited 15×
• Hays v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-02-28· cited 9×
• Frazier v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-10-28· cited 5×

Other cases named Gustin v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Gustin v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2012-01-17
• Gustin v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2012-01-17