Gustavsson v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a similarly worded provision in the First Step Act does not require a hearing
• holding that the First Step Act does not require a hearing
• concluding that the district court “did not abuse its discretion by considering the [defendant’s] rehabilitation, but not adjusting the sentence” under the First Step Act in part because of the defendant’s criminal history
• holding that the First Step Act does not require a hearing
• holding that district courts need not hold hearings on these motions
• explaining that the sentencing court must have considered the parties’ arguments and have a reasoned basis for its decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).