Gustavo Martinez v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “On appeal, Martinez characterizes his arguments as ‘Due Process’ claims, though they are more accurately characterized as claims that the BIA incorrectly determined that Martinez did not show changed country conditions to permit review of his motion to reopen.”
• reviewing for abuse of discretion denial of motion to reopen
• explaining when BIA abuses it discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).