Gustavo Marrero v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that exhaustion would not be required where the BIA did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate a particular claim
• noting that exhaustion would not be required where the BIA did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate a particular claim
• noting government's interest in placing appropriate incentives upon attending hearings and moving to reopen proceedings in context of concluding petitioner procedurally defaulted
• finding no due process violation where plaintiff had notice of the hearing and was aware of the circumstances of his failure to appear at the removal hearing
• dismissing the alien’s petition for review based on his failure to file a motion to reopen his deportation case when he had been ordered deported in absentia
• explaining exhaustion doctrine as providing the INS with the \opportunity to correct any due process error it might have made in entering its order to deport ... in absentia \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).