Gustaveson v. Dwyer
Citations
- 78 Wash. 336
- 139 P. 194
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1019
Syllabus
<p>Taxation — Lien of Taxes — Foreclosure—Title—Adverse Possession. The foreclosure of a tax lien being a proceeding in rem, vests in the purchaser a new title, independent of claims by adverse possession, under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 9230, declaring the lien of general taxes to be superior to all other liens and eláims upon the property.</p> <p>Limitation of Actions — Against State — Tax Title Held by County. Where a county purchased property at a general tax foreclosure sale for want of other purchasers, it holds the same in trust for the state, county, and other political subdivisions entitled to an apportionment of the tax on a resale; hence the statute of limitations does not run in favor of one in adverse possession of the land while the title is held by the county; in view of Rem. & Bal. Code, § 167, providing that there shall be no limitation to actions brought in the name or for the benefit of the state and that claims predicated upon the lapse of time shall not be asserted against the state.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- County took title through foreclosure and sale for delinquent taxes. “Manifestly, both record and possessory titles are equally absolutely destroyed by such a foreclosure”
- “[I]n no event, could appellant’s possession existing prior to the tax sale to the county on August 23, 1902, however exclusive or adverse the possession may have been, in the least impair the tax title of the county then acquired or the title of its grantees, after that date.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crow, Fullerton, Morris, Mount, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lippert v. JungCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-12· cited 61×
- Harrison v. EverettSupreme Court of Colorado· 1957-03-11· cited 38×
- State v. LG Electronics, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2016-07-14· cited 29×
- Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court· 1915-01-08· cited 29×
- Sparks v. Standard Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1916-08-25· cited 19×
- Tamblin v. CrowleyWashington Supreme Court· 1917-11-23· cited 19×
- Herrmann v. CissnaWashington Supreme Court· 1973-03-01· cited 18×
- Bassett v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 1917-11-02· cited 15×
- City of Tacoma v. Fletcher Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1928-11-27· cited 13×
- Label v. CleasbyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-06-30· cited 11×
- Broadhurst v. American Colloid CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1970-05-12· cited 11×
- Wilson v. KorteWashington Supreme Court· 1916-04-28· cited 9×
- Town of Sandwich v. QuirkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-02-21· cited 6×
- Town of Silver Plume v. HudsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1963-01-28· cited 5×
- Palin v. ShermanWashington Supreme Court· 1951-06-07· cited 2×
- State v. LG Elecs., Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2016-07-14
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Franklin County v. CarstensWashington Supreme Court· 1912-04-09· cited 30×
- McMillan v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court· 1901-11-25· cited 25×
- City of Ballard v. WayWashington Supreme Court· 1904-01-16· cited 24×
- Hanson v. CarrWashington Supreme Court· 1911-11-28· cited 24×
- Pennsylvania Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court· 1905-01-31· cited 14×
- Keene v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1903-03-05· cited 13×
- Continental Distributing Co. v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1913-06-04· cited 13×
Other cases named Gustaveson v. Dwyer
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.