Gusman v. LeBlanc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “emails pertaining to the development of [a] Frequently Asked Questions [document]” formed an essential link a specified consultative process because they were “part of the [agency’s] process of creating future [] policies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).