Skip to main content
· 5/10/2011

GUSKI v. Raja

Citations

  • 949 N.E.2d 695
  • 409 Ill. App. 3d 686
  • 350 Ill. Dec. 903

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the holding in Spyrka v. County of Cook, 366 Ill. App. 3d 156 (2006
  • “[W]here it appears that the circuit court understood the nature and character of the evidence sought to be presented, we may relax the forfeiture rule.”
  • failure to object during defendant’s closing argument “when the allegedly prejudicial remarks were made” results in forfeiture of the argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connors

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.