· 5/10/2011
GUSKI v. Raja
Citations
- 949 N.E.2d 695
- 409 Ill. App. 3d 686
- 350 Ill. Dec. 903
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the holding in Spyrka v. County of Cook, 366 Ill. App. 3d 156 (2006
- “[W]here it appears that the circuit court understood the nature and character of the evidence sought to be presented, we may relax the forfeiture rule.”
- failure to object during defendant’s closing argument “when the allegedly prejudicial remarks were made” results in forfeiture of the argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connors
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.