Guske v. Guske (In Re Guske)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that § 523(a)(2)(A) may be applied to a marital debt, but declining to do so under the particular facts of the case
• stating that certain non-support dissolution debt constitutes a “renewal” of the original debt
• “[I]f there are any warning signs (ie., obvious or known falsities ... ) either in the documents, in the nature of the transaction, or in the debt- or’s conduct or statements, the creditor has not justifiably relied on this representation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).