Skip to main content
· 10/17/2001

Federal Case

Citations

  • 269 F.3d 540
  • 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 513
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court’s mere declaration that its order was final and appealable lacked the necessary findings balancing the interests in permitting an interlocutory appeal
  • different theories of damages for same underlying injury
  • different theories of damages for same underlying injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.