Gus Lykos v. American Home Insurance Company, a New York Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict for insurer, where the evidence demonstrated the insured engaged in a pattern of overstating the value and quantity of items purportedly damaged in a building fire
• “The plaintiffs . . . claimed a loss of $395,805 in their sworn statement in proof of loss . . . . It is clear from the evidence that plaintiffs submitted the claim with the intent of receiving the total amount.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).