Gurvan B. Brown v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disqualification for service of a railway employee one month after his FELA action was not “newly discovered evidence” justifying Rule 60(b)(2) relief
• “[T]o sustain the burden of proving fraud and misrepresentation under Rule 60(b)(3), the evidence must be clear and convincing.”
• event occurring one month after close of case not newly discovered evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).