· 8/1/2006
Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter Casey Kroon Dennis Nelson Larry Munger Dan Silva
Citations
- 456 F.3d 978
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19297
- 2006 WL 2129737
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a substantial burden when the county’s actions “to a significantly great extent lessened the possibility that future CUP applications would be successful.”
- finding substantial burden where county’s two denials of Guru Nanak’s application significantly lessened the prospect of being able to build a temple in the future
- finding a substantial burden when the county’s actions “to a significantly great extent lessened the possibility that future CUP applications would be successful.”
- discussing whether the regulation was “oppressive to a significantly great extent” (cleaned up)
- discussing whether the regulation was “oppressive to a significantly great extent” (cleaned up)
- defining the rele- vant religious exercise as the congregation’s construction of a temple
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Rawlinson, Bea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.