Skip to main content
· 8/1/2006

Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter Casey Kroon Dennis Nelson Larry Munger Dan Silva

Citations

  • 456 F.3d 978
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19297
  • 2006 WL 2129737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a substantial burden when the county’s actions “to a significantly great extent lessened the possibility that future CUP applications would be successful.”
  • finding substantial burden where county’s two denials of Guru Nanak’s application significantly lessened the prospect of being able to build a temple in the future
  • finding a substantial burden when the county’s actions “to a significantly great extent lessened the possibility that future CUP applications would be successful.”
  • discussing whether the regulation was “oppressive to a significantly great extent” (cleaned up)
  • discussing whether the regulation was “oppressive to a significantly great extent” (cleaned up)
  • defining the rele- vant religious exercise as the congregation’s construction of a temple

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Rawlinson, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.