Gurry v. Board of Public Accountancy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that regulation disciplining accountants for acts “discreditable to the profession” was not impermissibly vague
• stating that a judicial stay would likely be available to consider allegations of due process violations notwithstanding a statutory prohibition upon such stays
• suspending accountant’s license for two years where he misappropriated funds of company for which he served as treasurer
• regulation allowing license suspension for act “discreditable” to public accounting profession upheld against vagueness challenge where board fairly exercised statutorily granted regulatory power and did not impose criminal sanction
• regulation permitting discipline of certified public accountants who commit “any act discreditable to the profession”
• “[a] party is not entitled to raise arguments on appeal that he could have raised, but did not raise, before the administrative agency ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).