Skip to main content
· 1/25/1996

Gurney v. Arizona Department of Revenue (In Re Gurney)

Citations

  • 192 B.R. 529
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 171
  • 1996 WL 84566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 108(c) does incorporate state tolling statutes, but does not incorporate unlimited or open ended state statutes of limitations
  • tolling not provided for under state statute, but section 507(a)(7)’s purpose and legislative history would be thwarted if debtor could avoid liability by four serial filings, therefore, equitable tolling via section 105(a
  • “Section 105(a) allows the bankruptcy courts to inject traditional equitable principles into the operation of the bankruptcy system to prevent abuse of the drafter’s intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pappas, Russell, Hagan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.