Gurka v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that witness’ statement about not dropping charges against defendant was inadmissible hearsay because testimony indirectly proved that witness had been told that defendant was not an informer
• holding that witness’ statement about not dropping charges against defendant was inadmissible hearsay because testimony indirectly proved that witness had been told that defendant was not an informer
• “Even if Gurka had preserved error as to either Reanell or Brittany’s testimony, their testimony did not convey any new facts to the jury. C.B. had already testified that she told Reanell and Brittany that Gurka had molested her.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).