Guoth v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that the Harris rule has not been applied to civil cases, but holding that it was irrelevant as the appellant had exhausted all of his peremptory strikes
• noting that Harris rule has not been expressly applied to civil cases
• noting that the jury \must be free from bias regarding the trial's outcome.\
• reversing and remanding for a new trial because appellant exhausted all peremptory challenges when trial court failed to strike jurors for cause
• jury verdict against doctor in medical malpractice case reversed despite assurances by juror, who was an employee at the hospital where the doctor worked, that she could set aside her personal feelings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).