Guo v. Meade Motorcars, L.L.C.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1930
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Guo's motion to set aside judgment because he did not establish grounds for relief under Civ.R. 60(B)(1)-(5). Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Guo's motion for sanctions where he did not demonstrate false or fraudulent testimony. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Guo's motion to set aside the sanctions against him where he cited and relied upon five different AI-hallucinated cases.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.