Gunville v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that cover letters from counsel to an expert that do not contain mental impressions, opinions or conclusions of counsel are discoverable, but written notes that contained the lawyer’s mental impressions were protected
• cover letters to and from expert witnesses are discoverable under general discovery provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1)
• based on the language of Rule 26 and the reasoning in Bogosian, concluding that “disclosure of core work product to a testifying expert does not abrogate the protection accorded such information” by the attorney work product doctrine
• directing production of draft reports

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).