Skip to main content
· 9/17/1925

Guntner v. Hughes

Citations

  • 143 Va. 36
  • 129 S.E. 239
  • 1925 Va. LEXIS 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting the Industrial Insurance Act to include in time-loss compensation health care benefits paid by an employer
  • “[T]he legislature intended that ‘wages’ include only those items that the employer was supplying before injury, and that the worker must replace, while disabled, out of time-loss compensation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prentis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.