Gunther v. State, 99-0499 (2002)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]hen a legal matter remains pending and active, the [attorney-client] privilege encompasses everything in an [attorney's] invoice, including the amount of aggregate fees”
• adopting the reasoning of a concurring opinion in 5 Costco
• adopting the reasoning of a concurring opinion in 11 Costco
• adopting the reasoning of a concurring opinion in 9 Costco
• noting the importance of the contents of 3 communications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).