Gunther GRAEFENHAIN and Philip Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PABST BREWING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a district court’s denial of request for appointment of counsel 14 where pleadings demonstrated petitioner had “a good understanding of the issues and the ability 15 to present forcefully and coherently his contentions”
• “A business decision need not be good or even wise. It simply has to be nondiscriminatory_”
• overruled on other grounds by Coston v. Plitt Theatres, Inc., 860 F.2d 834, 836 (7th Cir.1988)
• overruled on other grounds by Coston v. Plitt Theatres, Inc., 860 F.2d 834, 836 (7th Cir.1988)
• “A business decision need not be good or even wise. It simply has to be nondiscriminatory...”
• in assessing plaintiff’s showing of age discrimination, trial court should view the proffered evidence “in its totality” rather than in isolation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).