Gunther Graefenhain and Philip Miller, Cross-Appellees v. Pabst Brewing Company, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court has “broad discretion” in case management matters
• \[A] discharged employee must mitigate damages by using 'reasonable diligence in finding other suitable employment.'\
• \[A] stipulation is binding unless relief from the stipulation is necessary to prevent a 'manifest injustice' or the stipulation was entered into through inadvertence or based on an erroneous view of the facts or law.\
• “[A] discharged employee must mitigate damages by using ‘reasonable diligence in finding other suitable employment.’” (citing Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC, 458 U.S. 219, 231, 102 S. Ct. 3057, 73 L. Ed. 2d 721 (1982))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).