Gunter v. Laboratory Corp. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that claim concerning adequacy of laboratory’s blood testing procedures was one for common law negligence
• concluding that claim concerning adequacy of laboratory’s blood testing procedures was one for common law negligence
• noting that “the medical malpractice statute may extend to acts of non-physicians such as nurses, when they are involved in the medical treatment of a patient”
• noting that “[t]o determine which limitations statute controls Gunter’s [the plaintiff’s] claim against the laboratory, we must first decide whether the claim sounds in medical malpractice or negligence” and looking to the complaint for this determination
• “To determine which limitations statute controls Gunter‟s claim against the laboratory, we must first decide whether the claim sounds in medical malpractice or negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).