Skip to main content
· 3/4/1981

Gunter Harz Sports, Inc. v. United States Tennis Ass'n

Citations

  • 511 F. Supp. 1103
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • tennis association not required to provide individual notice and hearing to producer of type of tennis racket banned under regulation where it would be overly burdensome to afford a hearing to all such parties adversely affected
  • per se rule inapplicable to ban on double-strung tennis rackets
  • per se rule inapplicable to ban on double-strung tennis rackets
  • upholding ban on use of double-strung tennis rackets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schatz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.