Gunderson v. Peterson
Citations
- 65 Ill. 193
Syllabus
<p>Negligence—whether injury resulted from negligence or accident. The plaintiff, while in defendant’s service as mate of a schooner, received a personal injury from the breaking of a mast, whereby he fell therefrom upon the deck. In a suit to recover damages, the only negligence charged to the defendant was that the mast, before the accident, was twisted to a certain distance, and, therefore, unsafe, while the proof showed that the defects complained of were at least 12 feet from the place where the mast broke, and that there was not the slightest appearance of rottenness or decay at the place of the breaking, and that the accident was caused by a strong wind aloft, while there was only very little on deck: Held, that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and that the injury must be regarded as one incident to the service.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the phrase “Samuel Gordon and Phoebe Gordon, his wife, in joint tenancy” created a joint tenancy and not a tenancy by the entirety
- defeating presumption when deed granted land to “Samuel Gordon and Phoebe Gordon, his wife, in joint tenancy, their heirs and assigns, forever”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thoretoe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.