Gumina v. New Orleans Saints & Louisiana Worker's Compensation Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that court’s conclusion that victim was not criminal trespasser was based on factual findings
• \[t]he actor's knowledge that he is not privileged or licensed to enter or to remain on the premises is a requirement of criminal trespass\
• ‘‘[t]he actor’s knowledge that he is not privileged or licensed to enter or to remain on the premises is a requirement of criminal trespass’’
• evidence was sufficient to support factual finding that defendant knew he could have retreated in complete safety because he was familiar with apartment and was positioned near unobstructed doorway

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).