Skip to main content
· 9/17/1993

Gulley v. Pierce

Citations

  • 625 So. 2d 45
  • 1993 WL 366882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding decision of whether witness is qualified to testify as expert is factual determination falling within broad discretion of trial court, and trial judge's ruling in such regard will not be disturbed unless clear abuse of discretion is shown
  • harmless error rule applies if such expert evidence is merely cumulative to other evidence admitted without objection
  • a trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether a witness is qualified to testify as an expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.