Gullett v. Blanton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that allegations of a \long-running conspiracy\ that endured for \over a decade\ were plausible
• explaining that “[c]ourt[s] may take judicial notice of the press releases of government agencies” (quoting McLoughlin v. People’s United Bank, Inc., 586 F. Supp. 2d 70, 73 (D. Conn. 2008)
• finding antitrust injury where defendants engaged in price-fixing as horizontal competitors, which caused plaintiffs to pay supra-competitive prices
• finding antitrust injury where defendants engaged in price-fixing as horizontal competitors, which caused plaintiffs to pay supra-competitive prices
• relying in part on regulatory enforcement actions to find plausible allegations of a conspiracy to fix benchmark rates
• taking judicial notice of information provided in government agencies’ press releases under Federal Rule of Evidence 201

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).