· 7/1/2004
Gulledge v. Shaw
Citations
- 880 So. 2d 288
- 2004 WL 1471985
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- as a matter of law, bank not vicariously liable for employee’s knowing notarization of forged signature
- as a matter of law, bank not vicariously liable for employee's knowing notarization of forged signature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: En Banc
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.