Skip to main content
· 5/21/1958

Gulick v. Whitaker

Citations

  • 102 So. 2d 847
  • 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[w]here a PCRA petition is premature, we quash an appeal taken from a ruling on it”
  • holding that “[w]here a PCRA petition is premature, we quash an appeal taken from a ruling on it”
  • concluding that when a direct appeal is still pending, a premature PCRA petition must be quashed
  • holding that “[w]here a PCRA petition is premature, we quash an appeal taken from a ruling on it”
  • holding that the PCRA cannot be invoked until judgment of sentence is final
  • stating that “[i]nasmuch as [a]ppellant’s direct appeal is still pending…, it is patently clear that this PCRA petition is premature, and we must quash it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Kanner, Stephenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.