Skip to main content
· 8/2/1990

Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. Lipton

Citations

  • 765 F. Supp. 696
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18881
  • 1990 WL 294229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that as opposed to a cause of action \the case law indicates unanimously that a constructive trust is a remedy imposed to prevent the enjoyment of fraud or of a breach of a fiduciary duty\
  • declining to pierce a corporate veil for several reasons, including the fact that “the corporation whose veil [the plaintiff] is attempting to pierce has not been named a party to this action.”
  • “the court’s research reveals no case in any jurisdiction [holding] that constructive trust constitutes a cause of action”
  • \[the] court's research has revealed no case in any jurisdiction that supports GSS' argument that constructive trust constitutes a cause of action\
  • \[The] court's research has revealed no case in any jurisdiction that supports GSS' argument that constructive trust constitutes a cause of action.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.