· 2/13/1987
Gulf Life Insurance Company, a Florida Corporation v. Carl J. Arnold, an Individual Residing in the State of Tennessee
Citations
- 809 F.2d 1520
- 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1213
- 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2127
- 55 U.S.L.W. 2463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “but for the Declaratory Judgment Act, the only way this action would have arisen is a suit by Arnold to collect severance pay he claims is due_”
- declaratory judgment action by ERISA fiduciary to establish that it was not liable to a participant for severance benefits was not a suit to “enforce” the plan
- “[C]ivil actions under ERISA are limited only to those parties and actions Congress specifically enumerated….”
- “Congress did not intend ERISA fiduciaries to use declaratory judgment actions to determine the benefit rights of participants/beneficiaries.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roney, Edmondson, Tuttle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.