Gulf City Seafoods, Inc. v. Ludwig Shrimp Co. (In Re Gulf City Seafoods, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ultimate inquiry is whether credit arrangement “is so out of line with what others [in the relevant industry] do”
• “[T]hese payments were ‘ordinary’ as between Gulf City and Ludwig and therefore satisfied the first two prongs ... ”
• “We only say that the judge must satisfy himself or herself that there exists some basis in the practices of the industry to authenticate the credit arrangement at issue.”
• “We only say that the judge must satisfy himself or herself that there exists some basis in the practices of the industry to authenticate the credit arrangement at issue.”
• “We only say that the judge must satisfy himself or herself that there exists some basis in the practices of the industry to authenticate the credit arrangement at issue.”
• “We only say that the judge must satisfy himself or herself that there exists some basis in the practices of the industry to authenticate the credit arrangement at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).