Guled v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a noncitizen who does not meet the standard for asylum cannot meet the more rigorous clear probability standard for withholding of removal
• concluding that an alien who does not meet the standard for asylum cannot meet the more rigorous clear probability standard for withholding of removal
• holding that argument that IJ improperly weighed factors in denying cancellation of removal essentially challenged adverse discretionary conclusion and did not present reviewable question of law outside of the jurisdictional bar
• holding separate analysis under CAT is required only when there is evidence alien may be tortured for reasons unrelated to his claims for asylum and withholding of removal
• noting that a separate analysis under CAT is required only when there is evidence that the petitioner may be tortured for reasons unrelated to his claims for asylum and withholding of removal
• refusing to assert jurisdiction over a due-process claim in a cancellation-of-removal proceeding when the petitioner claimed that the IJ allowed a witness to testify without providing proper notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).