Skip to main content
· 1/18/2007

Gul Roney v. Illinois Department of Transportation

Citations

  • 474 F.3d 455
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1008
  • 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,708
  • 99 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1044
  • 2007 WL 117501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] charge of employment discrimination must be filed with the EEOC within 300 days of the alleged unlawful employment practice.”
  • a discrete act of discrimination “is an unlawful employment practice that must be brought to the EEOC’s attention within 300 days of its occurrence.”
  • “discriminatory acts proscribed by Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision are not limited to those that affect the terms and conditions of one’s employment”
  • “If a plaintiff does not file a charge concerning a discrete act of discriminatory conduct within 300 days of its occurrence, his claim is time-barred and he may not recover.”
  • “An employer’s truthful re- port to the police about an employee is not an adverse action.” (citing Aviles v. Cornell Forge Co., 241 F.3d 589, 593 (7th Cir. 2001)) (emphasis in original)
  • “[T]he record indicated Roney knew about the retaliatory act of which he now com plains shortly after it occurred ... however, Roney waited over 300 days to file a charge with the EEOC.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Flaum, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.