Skip to main content

Guiser, S. v. Sieber, M. & S.

Citations

  • 237 A.3d 496
  • 2020 Pa. Super. 182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, even though post-trial motions were pending and no final judgment had been entered, appeal from trial court’s decision to grant an injunction was appealable under Rule 311(a)(4)(ii), but other equitable claims were not yet ripe and appeal quashed as to those claims
  • reiterating the principle that “it is not error for the trial court to adopt a party’s proposed findings of fact and/or conclusions of law”
  • an appeal lies from the entry of judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nichols

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Guiser, S. v. Sieber, M. & S.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.