Skip to main content
· 1/21/1988

Guinther v. Wilkinson

Citations

  • 679 F. Supp. 1066
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 983
  • 1988 WL 8966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the definition of “sexual activity” in a prostitution statute unconstitutional, in part, because the terms “apparent or actual sexual stimulation or gratification” were wholly capricious and lacking a “standard of objective measurement”
  • finding the definition of \sexual activity\ in a prostitution statute unconstitutional, in part, because the terms \apparent or actual sexual stimulation or gratification\ were wholly capricious and lacking a \standard of objective measurement\
  • refusing to accept an attorney general’s stipulation that a statute is unconstitutional
  • only upon order of court is there a binding declaration of unconstitutionality of statute; stipulations and lack of enforcement by Attorney General are insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Thomas Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.