Guinand v. Walton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a letter from the party to be charged satisfied statute of frauds
• holding that a letter from the party to be charged satisfied statute of frauds
• concluding letter stating partner was entitled to ten percent interest in partnership assets, consisting of leaseholds and interest in lands, satisfied statute of frauds
• ―The purpose of the statute [of frauds] is that certain matters of great importance such as the conveyance of real estate should be protected against frauds and perjuries.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Microbiological Research Corp. v. Muna
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-01-22· cited 38×
• Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Keeley
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1989-10-19· cited 24×
• Jenkins v. Percival
  Utah Supreme Court· 1998-07-10· cited 23×
• English v. Standard Optical Co.
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-06-25· cited 21×
• Smith v. Osguthorpe
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2002-10-31· cited 16×
• Skousen v. Smith
  Utah Supreme Court· 1972-02-04· cited 3×
• Peterson v. Hendricks
  Utah Supreme Court· 1974-07-01· cited 2×
• Guinand v. Walton
  Utah Supreme Court· 1971-01-14· cited 2×
• JDW-CM, LLC v. Clark LHS, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-03-27· cited 1×
• WDIS v. Hi-Country Estates
  Utah Supreme Court· 2022-04-28

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zancanaro v. Cross
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1959-05-27· cited 67×
• Continental Bank and Trust Company v. Bybee
  Utah Supreme Court· 1957-02-08· cited 38×
• Stark v. Shaw
  California Court of Appeal· 1957-11-12· cited 13×

Other cases named Guinand v. Walton

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Guinand v. Walton
  Utah Supreme Court· 1971-01-14· cited 2×