Guinan v. Tenet Healthsystems of Hilton Head, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding expert's testimony was insufficient to survive summary judgment because the testimony, at most, showed the defendant deviated from the expert's personal standard of care rather than the generally accepted standard of care
• holding expert's testimony was insufficient to survive summary judgment because the testimony, at most, showed the defendant deviated from the expert's personal standard of care rather than the generally recognized and accepted standard of care
• holding expert’s testimony was insufficient to survive summary judgment because the testimony, at most, showed the defendant deviated from the expert’s personal standard of care rather than the generally accepted standard of care
• holding expert’s testimony was insufficient to survive summary judgment because the testimony, at most, showed the defendant deviated from the expert’s personal standard of care rather than the generally recognized and accepted standard of care
• holding the circuit court's grant of summary judgment was not premature because the party opposing summary judgment failed to demonstrate that \further discovery would uncover additional relevant evidence or create a genuine issue of material fact\
• \A party claiming summary judgment is premature because they have not been provided a full and fair opportunity to conduct discovery must advance a good reason why the time was insufficient under the facts of the case . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).