Guimont v. City of Seattle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the doctrine as “the complex, confusing and often-ethereal realm of theoretical law that has developed in Washington under the taking clause”
• the court could not hear the appellant's substantive due process claim regarding a relocation report requirement because the appellant had not submitted the required report
• the court could not hear the appellant’s substantive due process claim regarding a relocation report requirement because the appellant had not submitted the required report
• exclusion of recreational vehicles from mobile home parks under city ordinance was legitimate exercise of city’s zoning and police power for regulating land use
• an as-applied “takings claim is not ripe until ‘the initial government decision maker has arrived at a definite position, conclusively determining whether the property owner was denied all reasonable beneficial use of its property’ ‘

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).