Guilmette v. New York Telephone Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[b]ecause there was no error in the court’s ruling [denying a motion to open], we also con- clude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to reargue/recon- sider’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).